America's climate idiocy
It's hard to describe the scale of the staggering irresponsibility here
It's been another month of climate disasters. Puerto Rico remains in ruins, three weeks after being hit by the worst hurricane since 1928. Forty people and counting have died in the most deadly series of wildfires in California history — which is especially unusual for the northern part of the state. And on Monday, Ireland, of all places, was thrashed by a severe tropical storm.
Against that backdrop, the American government isn't just failing to address the most immediate problems arising from its domestic disasters, it's actually taking steps to make things worse.
And it's not just Trump. A huge bipartisan majority in the House of Representatives (including every single Democrat) voted for a $36.5 billion disaster relief package containing $16 billion in debt cancellation for the broken national flood insurance program — but $5 billion in loans for Puerto Rico, thus adding to the island's already preposterously unpayable $74 billion debt load.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Now, that's not all that is in the disaster relief bill. There is also $13.6 billion in disaster relief to be shared between Florida, Texas, and Puerto Rico, plus a $1.3 billion food stamp grant for the island. That's certainly better than nothing. But at a conservative estimate, that disaster relief total will not be remotely sufficient for either Texas or Puerto Rico, the two places hit worst out of the three. It's also maybe only a tenth (or less) of what is needed for a structural overhaul of Puerto Rico, both to rebuild it and to put it on sound economic footing.
As for the flood insurance program, it's not a bad idea in itself. It's reasonable for government to help homeowners hit by unusual floods. However, the administration and payout structure of the program is nuts and has been for decades. It uses badly outdated flood maps and funds rebuilding far more than relocation. As a result, it has paid for many homes to be rebuilt again and again and again. This small minority of total membership accounts for a large portion of the overall payouts.
Indeed, it's not really a home insurance program, as revealed by the $16 billion debt cancellation. What it amounts to, in many cases, is a subsidy for people to build homes in flood-prone areas.
What the program needs is reform to use cutting-edge science and maps so that very flood-prone areas are not subsidized, as well as a relocation allowance so people are not stuck on the floodplain. But thanks to a recent executive order from President Trump, FEMA (which runs the program), along with every other federal agency, is now forbidden from using climate change in future policy calculations — and no such payment reform is on the horizon.
That's only the latest area in which Trump is being objectively pro-climate disaster. Scott Pruitt, the oil and gas stooge who Trump appointed to be EPA administrator, recently repealed President Obama's Clean Power Plan to cut carbon emissions. Trump also recently tapped Barry Myers of AccuWeather to head the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; the CEO has long criticized NOAA weather analysis and science as offering unfair competition to private weather forecasters.
Finally, of course, Trump's proposed budget slashed funding for both the EPA and NOAA — especially the allocation for basic research.
It's hard to describe the scale of the staggering irresponsibility here.
Literally in the midst of clockwork weather disasters almost certainly worsened by human-caused climate change, when half the planet is paying close attention to NOAA work, Trump is handing it and the EPA to corporate goons to tear apart for their highly probable personal benefit, and repealing the biggest effort to tackle climate change in American history. (Not to mention how Trump's Department of Energy and USDA has banned the use of the term "climate change," and how he has disbanded the advisory panel which produced the National Climate Assessment.) It's as if after the Pearl Harbor attack, President Roosevelt denied that it had happened, proposed huge cuts in funding to the Navy and the Air Force, and appointed Isoroku Yamamoto to be secretary of defense.
It's perhaps ironic that the party of bug-eyed, purple-faced hyper-nationalism, wrapped in the flag and bellowing the national anthem at hourly intervals, is working to physically destroy much of the country, but it's what's happening. Let us remember this the next time Republicans start howling about national security.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Ryan Cooper is a national correspondent at TheWeek.com. His work has appeared in the Washington Monthly, The New Republic, and the Washington Post.
-
A 'two-tier society': the new hate crime law in Scotland
Talking Point New act has been dismissed as 'illiberal' and 'patronising'
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
'Booming business in babies'
Today's Newspapers A roundup of the headlines from the US front pages
By The Week Staff Published
-
A return to basics: unprocessed vegan food makes a comeback
The Week recommends More people who eat a plant-based diet are avoiding meat substitutes and choosing to cook from scratch
By Adrienne Wyper, The Week UK Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Xi-Biden meeting: what's in it for both leaders?
Today's Big Question Two superpowers seek to stabilise relations amid global turmoil but core issues of security, trade and Taiwan remain
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Will North Korea take advantage of Israel-Hamas conflict?
Today's Big Question Pyongyang's ties with Russia are 'growing and dangerous' amid reports it sent weapons to Gaza
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published