Trump's twisted mercy
The president's proposed pardons for war criminals reward injustice
One thing we know about President Trump is this: He is not a forgiving man.
His list of grievances — real and imagined — seems to grow every day, his Twitter feed a never-ending recitation of enemies, old and new: Hillary Clinton, former FBI Director James Comey, Special Counsel Robert Mueller, The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN, Rosie O'Donnell, and on and on.
The president is vindictive, and proud of it.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
And yet Trump, like all presidents, possesses the power to offer clemency for federal crimes. Pardons are acts of lenience and grace, qualities we don't normally associate with this president. So, naturally, Trump uses his authority in distorted fashion, in ways that seem designed to actually decrease the net amount of mercy and justice in the world.
For example, The New York Times reported over the weekend the president is considering offering Memorial Day pardons to U.S. military veterans accused — and in some cases, convicted — of war crimes "including high-profile cases of murder, attempted murder, and desecration of a corpse."
Memorial Day, of course, is meant to honor the valor of American troops. Trump would use the holiday to instead highlight acts of dishonor — and to reward them.
"Presidents use pardons to send messages," Margaret Love, a pardon attorney in previous presidential administrations, told the Times. "If this president is planning to pardon a bunch of people charged with war crimes, he will use the pardon power to send a far darker message."
Indeed, the proposed Memorial Day pardons follow on the heels of other recent acts of Trumpian clemency: In the last few weeks, the president has pardoned Conrad Black, a former newspaper publisher who wrote a really nice book about him, as well as Michael Behenna, a former Army lieutenant convicted of killing an Iraqi man in his custody. Trump in 2017 also pardoned Joe Arpaio, the former Arizona sheriff and immigration hardliner convicted of contempt of court because he refused to stop his department's racial profiling of Latinos.
In other words, Trump uses his pardon power to troll political opponents, reward friends, and to eliminate constraints on his agenda. The proposed Memorial Day pardons would be more of the same.
Among those being considered for clemency are Navy SEAL Special Operations Chief Edward Gallagher, who is awaiting trial on charges he killed unarmed civilians; Nicholas Slatten, a former Blackwater security contractor, convicted for his part in a 2007 shooting spree that left 14 Iraqi civilians dead; and a group of Marine Corps snipers charged with urinating on dead Taliban fighters.
Most of these cases have not yet gone to trial. In other words, if he proceeds with the pardons, Trump will be signalling that issues of guilt or innocence are irrelevant to his decision-making. Even the president's ostensible allies are warning against such premature pardons.
"These cases should be decided by the courts, where the entirety of the evidence can be viewed," said Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-Texas), himself a former SEAL. "Only after that should a pardon be considered."
When paired with his administration's efforts to undermine the International Criminal Court, as well as the president's own lawless rhetoric on warfighting, pardons in such cases would send an unmistakable message that the United States will not be constrained in its dealings with the rest of the world — not by domestic or military law, not by international law, and not even by conventional understandings of morality.
It's a dangerous stance to take.
Pardons aren't going to be popular, as a general rule. After all, they're given to people accused and convicted of federal crimes. It's easy for an act of clemency to look like an abuse of power — remember former President Bill Clinton's pardon of Marc Rich? — or insufficiently tough on crime. But the Founders gave the president clemency power because they recognized that the legal system could sometimes produce bad results, and that sometimes "a mitigation of the rigor of the law" is required to serve real justice. Without the possibility of clemency, Alexander Hamilton wrote, "justice would wear a countenance too sanguinary and cruel."
In other words, presidential pardons are supposed to reduce cruelty. Trump would reward and encourage it. In this president's hands, it seems, even the power of mercy can become ugly and twisted.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Joel Mathis is a freelance writer who has spent nine years as a syndicated columnist, co-writing the RedBlueAmerica column as the liberal half of a point-counterpoint duo. His work also regularly appears in National Geographic, The Kansas City Star and Heatmap News. His awards include best online commentary at the Online News Association and (twice) at the City and Regional Magazine Association.
-
Indie film's 'very brief' use of AI sparks backlash and calls for boycotts
Talking Points Did the creators of a new horror movie make a deal with the artificial intelligence devil?
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Could Taylor Swift swing the election?
Today's Big Question The pop star has outsized influence — and that extends beyond the music industry
By Anya Jaremko-Greenwold Published
-
Kevin Hart awarded Mark Twain Prize
Speed Read He is the 25th recipient of the prestigious comedy prize
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Xi-Biden meeting: what's in it for both leaders?
Today's Big Question Two superpowers seek to stabilise relations amid global turmoil but core issues of security, trade and Taiwan remain
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Will North Korea take advantage of Israel-Hamas conflict?
Today's Big Question Pyongyang's ties with Russia are 'growing and dangerous' amid reports it sent weapons to Gaza
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published