On Wednesday, the Veterans Affairs Department released an annual survey showing that the number of homeless veterans rose 1.5 percent in 2017 versus 2016, the first increase since 2010. Also on Wednesday, Politico reported that VA Secretary David Shulkin has decided to end a $460 million program to provide housing for homeless vets.
The VA had quietly announced the decision to end the program, administered with the Department of Housing and Urban Development, in September, but faced blowback when officials brought up the decision in a Dec. 1 phone call arranged by Shulkin's Advisory Committee on Homeless Veterans. Veterans' advocates, state agencies, and even HUD officials attacked the decision, five people on the call tell Politico. VA officials briefed congressional staffers on Tuesday, and all 14 members of the Senate appropriations VA subcommittee asked Shulkin to reconsider the decision. One of the senators, Patty Murray (D-Wash.), called the move "a new low" for the Trump administration and "especially callous and perplexing" given the rising number of homeless vets.
In a statement Wednesday evening, Shulkin said "there will be absolutely no change in the funding to support our homeless programs," and he "will solicit input from our local VA leaders and external stakeholders on how best to target our funding to the geographical areas that need it most." The VA decided to shift the funds from the program — in which HUD gives housing vouchers to veterans and VA connects vets with apartments and manages their cases — to local VA hospitals, who can use the money as they see fit, as long as they deal with homelessness.
The defunded program has served 138,000 vets since 2010 and roughly halved the number without housing, Politico says, citing HUD data. "The people in this program are the most vulnerable individuals," says Matt Leslie at Virginia's Department of Veterans Services. "If someone's going to die on the streets, they are the ones." Peter Weber
Indiana Gov. Mike Pence might say he's against the gambling industry, but his actions suggest otherwise. An in-depth report by International Business Times published Tuesday, the day of the first and only vice presidential debate this election cycle, revealed that Pence has been backed by and gotten money from numerous Indiana gaming operators and gaming lobbying firms:
Pence initially pledged to oppose efforts to grow the state's gambling industry. "I do not support an expansion of gaming in Indiana," he said in March of 2013, just two months after becoming governor. The statement won praise from a major religious group in the state. Pence also trumpeted his congressional efforts to outlaw internet gaming, and said, "I've never bought a lottery ticket."
IBT/MapLight's review, however, shows that since 2011, Pence received roughly $2.2 million from Indiana gaming operators and their lobbying firms. That includes about $490,000 from nine gaming-linked lobbying firms and their employees directly to Pence's campaign; at least $360,000 more from gaming industry lobbying firms and their employees to the Indiana Republican Party; and $1.4 million from Indiana gaming interests and their lobbying firms to the [Republican Governors Association], which backed Pence's gubernatorial bids. [IBT]
With that money in hand, Pence signed legislation that gave the gambling industry a "lucrative tax cut," IBT reported — and in some instances, "the donations arrived shortly before or after governments cemented everything from road contracts to economic development subsidies to pension deals." Indiana now ranks number five among the country's largest gaming states.
Pence's 2016 spokesperson Marc Lotter maintained in an emailed statement to IBT that Pence has "held the position that gaming should not be expanded in Indiana." Head over to IBT for the full story. Becca Stanek